The Final Death Clue (#15) The "Final Death Clue #15" isn't a clue like the others. It's just another reminder to you that you're on the right path as long as you remain skeptical throughout your entire investigation. Since there isn't a definite "right" or "wrong" answer to all of this, you should instead be trying to find an 'answer' that is considered PLAUSIBLE. Be sure to read the descriptions below of the three possible ratings for your theory and investigation: PLAUSIBLE: The group provided ample evidence to support their theory. Arguments and points were supported with sufficient, relevant and valid evidence. Reasoning appeared to be free of fallacies. The group addressed reasons as to why/how they eliminated other possible causes of death. The overall presentation was convincing, believable and removed most, if not all, room for doubt or additional questions from others. Exceptional effort appears to have been put-in to the quality of this project and presentation.
NOT PLAUSIBLE: The group provided evidence to support their theory; however, not all of the evidence was supported with sufficient, relevant and valid evidence. Reasoning caused room to doubt truthfulness and/or did not effectively eliminate other possible causes of death. Average effort appears to have been put-in to the quality of this project and presentation.
UNDETERMINED/ INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE PROVIDED: The group could not provide evidence that was sufficient, relevant and/or valid. The group's presentation did not address other possible causes of death and did little remove others' doubt, or to answer all essential questions. Inadequate effort appears to have been put-in the quality of this project and presentation.
The Final Death Clue (#15)
The "Final Death Clue #15" isn't a clue like the others. It's just another reminder to you that you're on the right path as long as you remain skeptical throughout your entire investigation. Since there isn't a definite "right" or "wrong" answer to all of this, you should instead be trying to find an 'answer' that is considered PLAUSIBLE.
Be sure to read the descriptions below of the three possible ratings for your theory and investigation:
PLAUSIBLE: The group provided ample evidence to support their theory. Arguments and points were supported with sufficient, relevant and valid evidence. Reasoning appeared to be free of fallacies. The group addressed reasons as to why/how they eliminated other possible causes of death. The overall presentation was convincing, believable and removed most, if not all, room for doubt or additional questions from others. Exceptional effort appears to have been put-in to the quality of this project and presentation.
NOT PLAUSIBLE: The group provided evidence to support their theory; however, not all of the evidence was supported with sufficient, relevant and valid evidence. Reasoning caused room to doubt truthfulness and/or did not effectively eliminate other possible causes of death. Average effort appears to have been put-in to the quality of this project and presentation.
UNDETERMINED/ INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE PROVIDED: The group could not provide evidence that was sufficient, relevant and/or valid. The group's presentation did not address other possible causes of death and did little remove others' doubt, or to answer all essential questions. Inadequate effort appears to have been put-in the quality of this project and presentation.